Conditional Party Government in the States
نویسندگان
چکیده
©2002 by the Midwest Political Science Association A lthough theories about legislative politics continue to proliferate, their range of empirical application is all too often limited, generally encompassing only the U.S. Congress or even just the House. Here, we conduct what is essentially comparative research by testing theories of parties and committees in a number of state legislatures. This provides us the variation to be able to examine current theories of the role of the political party in legislative politics and its connections to informational and partisan theories of legislative design. We combine some aspects of electoral politics to develop a measure of the effective number of parties, roll-call voting to estimate legislators’ preferences, and committee membership to examine the effects of differing levels of partisan polarization on the representativeness of committees. In the next section, we develop the relevant theoretical considerations. We then turn to data and measurement issues. The analytic sections then consider how closely state legislators satisfy the polarization condition in Aldrich and Rohde’s conditional party government account. We then examine these results with respect to the number of effective parties and the degree of partisan competition. That is, the electorate’s actions are compared to the distribution of (estimated) preferences among the winners of these elections. The third analytic section examines the impact of partisan competition and polarization on the distribution of legislators to committees. We find that there is substantial variation in the degree to which state legislatures meet Aldrich and Rohde’s polarization condition, extending far beyond the extreme values observed for the modern U.S. House. We find a strong negative relationship between the size of the majority party and the polarization of the parties. Finally, we find that chambers with more equally sized parties and more polarized parties tend to choose more representative committees. Conditional Party Government in the States
منابع مشابه
Feminism and Abortion in the United States’ Party Politics
Abstract The feminist movement in the United States like other countries has tried to establish equality for women. From the first attempts to gain constitutional right for vote, up to the current radical demands, feminists have struggled to make changes in the U.S. party politics and obtain their rights within the parties. One of the important issues in which women played a key role in party ...
متن کاملTesting for Asymmetric Information in Automobile Insurance Market an Iranian Insurance Company
The presence of asymmetric information is an important source of efficiency loss for insurance companies and could reduce profitability. In this paper, we test the conditional independence of coverage choice and risk, where “conditional” means conditional on all variables observed by the insurer. We use two parametric methods: a pair of probits and a bivariate probit model. The data includes al...
متن کاملChamber Medians, Party Medians , and Theories of Party Politics in Congress
Chamber Medians, Party Medians , and Theories of Party Politics in Congress This paper tests hypotheses derived from the debate between proponents of the conditional party government theory (Aldrich 1995; Aldrich and Rohde 2000; Rohde 1991) and those who argue that a preference based model accounts for outcomes as well as the more complex conditional party government theory (Krehbiel 1998). Ana...
متن کاملThe Changing Value of Seniority in the US House: Conditional Party Government Revised∗
In this paper we argue that institutional changes to the seniority system have electoral consequences to incumbents. Building on the theory of Conditional Party Government, we argue that the consolidation of power in the hands of party leadership reduces the electoral value of seniority. This reduction occurs because power that was previously in the hands of committee chairs, whose roles are ob...
متن کاملObstacles to the Consolidation of Democracy in Turkey (2002 –present) "The vague political nature, the organized structure of the party, and the authoritarian leadership"
Abstract The process of democratization of Turkey over more than a century has been accompanied by various barriers, such as military intervention, inefficient and passive opposition, undemocratic performance and sponsor of the religious-political tariqa, ethnic and religious rifts, authoritarian government leaders, political parties’ poor and sometimes biased performance, contradictory intern...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2001